<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Competitive Advantage by Michael Porter, Part 4</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brekiri.com/blog/343/competitive-advantage-by-michael-porter-part-4/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brekiri.com/blog/343/competitive-advantage-by-michael-porter-part-4/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 15:40:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marco Monfils</title>
		<link>http://www.brekiri.com/blog/343/competitive-advantage-by-michael-porter-part-4/comment-page-1/#comment-92</link>
		<dc:creator>Marco Monfils</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 02:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brekiri.com/blog/?p=343#comment-92</guid>
		<description>Hi Greg, thanks you for the reply, and yes, I understand what you say. I do however see a difference between different and differentiated. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If something is different (there is no alternative), this should in theory command a premium. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If something is differentiated, but lacks a credible point of difference, it will not be able to command a premium, at least not from a brand point of view...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My 1c-&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The practice of differentiation (as the sole RTB) in support of premium price dates from the past. If  you cling to this belief, you may find your brand is a legacy, marketing to the past (to consumer who also believes this).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Differentiation as a marketing tool works best under parity price conditions.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thank you for opportunity to reply!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Greg, thanks you for the reply, and yes, I understand what you say. I do however see a difference between different and differentiated. If something is different (there is no alternative), this should in theory command a premium. If something is differentiated, but lacks a credible point of difference, it will not be able to command a premium, at least not from a brand point of view&#8230;My 1c-The practice of differentiation (as the sole RTB) in support of premium price dates from the past. If  you cling to this belief, you may find your brand is a legacy, marketing to the past (to consumer who also believes this).Differentiation as a marketing tool works best under parity price conditions.Thank you for opportunity to reply!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg4</title>
		<link>http://www.brekiri.com/blog/343/competitive-advantage-by-michael-porter-part-4/comment-page-1/#comment-89</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 19:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brekiri.com/blog/?p=343#comment-89</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comments.  I&#039;m not sure that I agree that customers are less&lt;br&gt;willing to pay a premium for differentiated products.  If anything, I would&lt;br&gt;argue the opposite.  There are more and more premium products on the market,&lt;br&gt;everything from the Apple iPad to gourmet chocolate to flat screen&lt;br&gt;televisions.  The other thing I try to keep in mind is that a differentiated&lt;br&gt;product might not always be sold at a premium.  Products like Facebook are&lt;br&gt;free for consumers and priced at a commodity level for advertisers with the&lt;br&gt;goal of gaining market share based on their differentiation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comments.  I&#039;m not sure that I agree that customers are lesswilling to pay a premium for differentiated products.  If anything, I wouldargue the opposite.  There are more and more premium products on the market,everything from the Apple iPad to gourmet chocolate to flat screentelevisions.  The other thing I try to keep in mind is that a differentiatedproduct might not always be sold at a premium.  Products like Facebook arefree for consumers and priced at a commodity level for advertisers with thegoal of gaining market share based on their differentiation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marco Monfils</title>
		<link>http://www.brekiri.com/blog/343/competitive-advantage-by-michael-porter-part-4/comment-page-1/#comment-88</link>
		<dc:creator>Marco Monfils</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 17:21:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brekiri.com/blog/?p=343#comment-88</guid>
		<description>The marketing formulation for a brand looks something like this:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;B = C + AV (if AV &gt; AC), in the eyes of the consumer&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Index:&lt;br&gt;B = brand&lt;br&gt;C = commodity&lt;br&gt;AV = added value&lt;br&gt;AC = added cost&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;About differentiation as a marketing tool, &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I believe the biggest challenge is to accept the heyday of product differentiation is over... &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Consumers are less likely to pay premium for differentiated products, simply because they are different...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;About strategy and the trade off between cost and performance, it is not impossible to get both right, at the same time:-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The marketing formulation for a brand looks something like this:B = C + AV (if AV &gt; AC), in the eyes of the consumerIndex:B = brandC = commodityAV = added valueAC = added costAbout differentiation as a marketing tool, I believe the biggest challenge is to accept the heyday of product differentiation is over&#8230; Consumers are less likely to pay premium for differentiated products, simply because they are different&#8230;About strategy and the trade off between cost and performance, it is not impossible to get both right, at the same time:-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

